![]() |
| Calliope, the muse of epic poetry, with volumes of Homer and Virgil |
This month nine statues will return to the roof of Oxford University’s Clarendon Building, formerly a classical gateway to the city’s centre of learning, now Bodleian Library offices. These statues are the Muses, each devoted to providing inspiration for students or practitioners of these disciplines:
Calliope – Epic Poetry
Clio – History
Erato – Love Poetry
Euterpe – Music
Melpomene – Tragedy
Polyhymnia – Rhetoric
Terpsichore – Dance
Thalia – Comedy
Urania – Astronomy
These lead statues were originally erected on the roof in
1717 but subsequently fell off, disappeared, or keeled over. Calliope, for
example, lasted only 38 years before disappearing, ‘likely melted down’, says
the University. Only Thalia remains in place, despite a 1935 fall which left
her ‘a shapeless mass of lead’, after which she was restored.
The statues have now been recreated and three of them recently spent some time in the foyer of the Bodleian’s Weston Library as part of The Muddle of the Muses exhibition. This was one of a series of small exhibitions using just one display case which I’ve been increasingly impressed by over the past few years (another was The Dancing Master, reviewed here).
Also in the exhibition were photos of the 3D printing
process which made them anew, a contemporary engraving of the Clarendon building
and, fittingly, a mention of Christopher Nolan’s 2026 film Odyssey and a graphic adaptation of the story released in 2010, two
things which could have been inspired by Calliope.
So a good mix of
contemporary documents from around the time they were erected, photos of the
reproduction process, works they inspired, and not least three of the recreated
ladies themselves.
![]() |
| Polyhymnia packed up and ready to go |
Who would modern Muses be?
The Muses’
subjects, however, have long been superseded and are no longer central to
learning. Rhetoric, for example, is more likely to be used as a derogatory term
than studied as a subject. I wondered what modern Muses would be? I suggest
these three:
Method
Central to all
subjects. How will you investigate this research question? Deduction or
induction? Quantitative or qualitative research?
Theory
What are you trying
to prove/disprove? Whose ideas guide your thoughts?
Statistics
How common is this
phenomenon? How significant is its occurrence in your sample?
Interestingly,
these are all ‘how’ Muses, while the originals were ‘what’. They place more emphasis
on the student’s own enquiry rather than on learning content from the Ancients.
I look forward to
seeing the resurrected Muses.
The Muddle of the Muses was at the Weston Library earlier this year.
![]() |
| Ready to leave |



No comments:
Post a Comment