Picture from: http://mentalfloss.com/article/68209/14-things-know-about-velazquezs-las-meninas
|
It can be emotionally exhausting to wander through the Prado’s
galleries. The museum specialises in 16th to 18th century
paintings, particularly portraits, and many challenging gazes meet you from the
walls. Without the luxury of easy reproduction technologies, painters had to
convey as much as they could about the sitter in one shot, as it were, and the
result is very condensed. Personality, status, profession, age, mood – in clothes,
face, objects, background.
Mary Tudor, then betrothed to Philip II of Spain, looks
cross and formidable, as if she has been forced to sit and hold the red Tudor
Rose and is ready to spring out of her chair the moment the sitting is over. Nearby
is a portrait of the Grand Duke of Alba’s court jester: ‘only his large head,
short legs and deformed hand (holding a deck of cards)… indicate his status of
buffoon,’ says the label. In another room, St Peter Nolasco stares at an
apparition of Saint Peter crucified upside down.
This time I am caught by Tintoretto’s Christ Washing the Disciples’ Feet in a main hall, mainly for the
charming scenes in the background – a crystal ship on an almost transparent
sea, just sailed through a neoclassical arch; the Last Supper in a back room,
sparky halos barely glimpsed. A dog sits squarely in the foreground.
A dog also appears in the foreground of Velasquez's Las Meninas (‘the maids of honour’), being teased by one of the
attendants surrounding the little Infanta Margarita. She looks out from the
canvas, perhaps at her parents Philip IV and Mariana of Austria, who would be
standing roughly where I am now, since they are reflected in a mirror on the
back wall. Another attendant leans to speak solicitously to the child, and a
taller one also leans into her protectively, while glancing at us. Another
servant stands in an open doorway at the back of the room, yellow light beyond.
But the most challenging gaze in the picture comes from higher up, from the
painter himself, staring down from behind a huge canvas he is working on
(perhaps even this one?), which we see from the back.
I fight off art history voices pointing out how, by putting
himself in the picture, the artist highlights the subjective nature of
representation, or makes plain the role of the painter-servant in legitimising
the Spanish monarchy. What strikes me most is that this little group seem about
to leave. The Infanta is still looking appealingly at her parents, but the
group is breaking up and has started to chat, play and relax. There is
movement, dynamism, crosscurrents, unlike Mary Tudor’s gripped posture. It is a
playful portrait, of people about to disappear into their own world again, far
from us.
No comments:
Post a Comment